Leo in the country today, an article entitled "I disagree, but not transgressed" , written by Clara Bayarri, Judge of the High Court which issued a dissenting, with Ricardo Prada and Ramón Sáez, which were in favor of the jurisdiction of the National Court to investigate the crimes of the Franco regime.
Without entering the debate on justice, I should not, because I live with it, I always thought the lawyers were paid to decide, because somebody had to do, and because someone had to RECACER that weight now they call it the same transgression.
copy a portion of the article that I found very honest and sincere, because nothing is more scarce in this world that people regardless of opinion, that is not tied to ideologies and can speak openly and proudly "I am, yes, a dissenting.
copy a portion of the article that I found very honest and sincere, because nothing is more scarce in this world that people regardless of opinion, that is not tied to ideologies and can speak openly and proudly "I am, yes, a dissenting.
"I am, yes, a disagreement. So I do not consider my fellow court are ignorant or a treacherous: simply interpret the law differently from mine. I am a dissenting, yes, but I'm not so a gross ignorance of the law or a prevaricating: Article 6 of the Organic Law of the Judiciary provides that judges and courts do not apply the laws and standards contrary to the Constitution, and Article 10.2 of the Constitution provides that the rules concerning the interpretation of fundamental rights (and the right to effective judicial protection is) construed in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and treaties and conventions ratified by Spain. I am not an enemy to destroy. Not even an adversary. I am a disagreement. Nothing more. Nothing less. I am a dissenting. And proud. "
This society needs an approach that is not limited by a narrow institutional or political thought, not utopian visions, which do not lead anything. Precisely the discrepancy, freedom of thought, ideology, free beings, objective and non-politicized is where the "crux" of the issue. Where one can expose your choice without having to defend the institutional position of those who are paid salary, not a politician has to defend the indefensible because it is "line" of the party, or a newspaper has to be guided by the well marked " editorial line. "
debates and controversies are needed to set the stage for the future, but do not fall into the easy to polarize, because history has shown us that the struggle of brother against brother has not been capable of solving problems, and it always has tragic consequences.
Viva la difference!
0 comments:
Post a Comment