It is a fact, the new penal code which will take effect next December granted immunity from prosecution to the State, the Administration, Political Parties and Trade Unions. The reform is in the Art.31 bis, paragraph 5. Something in my view fair, unjust and interested, which has not been fully explained and that it violates the English Constitution in Article 9.1 " citizens and public authorities are subject to the Constitution and other legislation" , I understand that "the law" also includes the criminal, right?. So I do not understand, and if someone explains it to me, I appreciate it.
What we do with the crimes of corruption by political parties and fraud by grants from the unions?, which some call the "Secret Society" a kind of administration in the shade is not known for sure to whom or defenders. Have they given the right of Grace? The hope for justice was the only thing left to ordinary citizens to see how those crimes were not immune, now, those hopes were didipan.
These are the novelties of Penal Code:
1. Legal persons are criminally responsible for crimes committed on behalf or on behalf of them, and for their benefit, legal representatives and administrators.
2. The criminal liability of legal persons will be required where it finds the commission of a crime committed by who holds the position or duties prescribed in the first period.
3. The turnout in people who have made materially the facts or they would have made it possible for not exercising proper control, shall not exclude or modify the criminal liability of legal persons.
4. Be mitigating circumstances after the commission Crime: confess the offense, collaborate on research providing evidence for repair or reduce the damage and have prevented future crimes.
5. The provisions of the criminal liability of legal persons shall not apply to state government, public corporations, political parties, trade unions ...
6. The penalties applicable to legal persons shall be from fines proportionate loss of subsidies, dissolution of the company, suspension of activities until 5 years or closure of their premises.
Expansion News: " The PSOE achieved immunity from prosecution for political parties and unions "
We piled the news of the violation of constitutional rights and human rights around us, which seems to want us to get used to hearing. There is more to do the deportation of Romanian citizens by the French authorities in recent days, of those who still try to give an explanation for such a violation, not of rights of European citizens, but a breach Human Rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights signed in Paris on 10 December 1948.
The European Union is founded on the values \u200b\u200bof respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, rule of law and respect for human rights, including minority rights. Violation of these rights could be liable on the Member State concerned, reasoned proposal by one third of the Member States of the European Parliament or the Commission, the Council, by a majority of four fifths of its members after European Parliament's approval, may appear or the existence of a risk of serious violation by a Member State of these, and if deemed appropriate could guide "recommendations" that is to set out a European state that violates human rights, to a mere recommendation, given the above majority.
So I think what such law, such provision, many rights that we assume and presume to have, if any law is interpreted by a state at will and interest and no one can do nothing but watch, or recommend. I wonder what window are claimed Constitutional Rights and Human Rights , to whom, and how it may have as many rights and freedoms throughout the Universal system, regardless of race, sex, religion, political opinion, etc, when of truth, not just paper, a false appearance of a good thought to have innate, and why so many people gave their lives, but it really is just something nice, that looks great in a solemn ceremony, with Reyes and Heads of state from marketing a product more of a democratic society that a social reality, because at the moment of truth in the window where rights are claimed says
0 comments:
Post a Comment